Dr. Pojani in her lecture at Penang Heritage of Friday entitled “Urban Transport Crisis in Small and Medium Size Developing Cities and the Effectiveness of Countermeasures” — at one point advises us to FOLLOW THE MONEY. Now that’s an interesting comment and really makes me wish I had been with you. Here’s an example of how I interpret this counsel from my perspective as a strategic planner.
Thanks to Andrew we have a YouTube recording of the Dr. Pojani lecture – at https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10155333414145550&id=756525549 . Hopefully her presentation slides will be available shortly for all those of us who were not in Penang that day.
The hard truth in the above graphic is that politicians and engineers traditionally have had trouble accepting this strategic approach – precisely because they are trained to look at something else. It’s simply a matter of long-standing professional deformation (if that is English). It does not have to be that way, but in order to get around the corner on this particular problem, both the politicians and their engineers need to look at the issues and choices from the OVERALL strategic situation — which is quite different from the one they are accustomed to seeing.
Follow the money
But now on to Dr. Pojani’s point with her “follow the money” comment. In this case those actors who have direct financial interests in actually building more roads – without taking the external costs or impacts of the following acts into full account. Who are these players?
*- Well of course it includes any company whose business it is to build roads, tunnel and bridges to accommodate all those additional cars. (Nothing surprising about that.)
*-Likewise, property developers and construction firms eager to open up new and more distant territories for residential and commercial developments linked by highways and cars. (Cheap land. Long drives, of which cost is borne by the car owner and the state. Thus, win-win for them.
*-And of course the automotive and petrol industry and associated lobbies and suppliers.
*- Then from top to bottom on this list there are their respective financial partners.
The point is this: this makes a formidable and powerful coalition of interests and lobbies for more, wider and faster roads.
It is not that there is anything wrong in their pursuing their own interests. To the contrary, these groups are pillars of the market economy and necessary to our well-being in this complex and fast-changing 21st century.
The business of business is business. And the business of government is governance. And it is the job of good governance to ensure that the public interest does not suffer as a result of their activity and profits. And that is where civil society comes in (if you’re lucky).
Which means of course that we — and they — have plenty of work ahead.
Want to see more on this? Take a minute to check out the following World Streets article: “Whoops! How Planners and Engineers Badly Overestimate Car Traffic” at http://wp.me/psKUY-3Qr.
# # #
About the editor:
9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France
Bio: Educated as an international development economist, Eric Britton is an American political scientist, teacher and sustainability activist who has worked on missions and advisory assignments on all continents. Professor of Sustainable Development, Economy and Democracy at the Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Paris), he is also MD of EcoPlan Association, an independent advisory network providing strategic counsel for government and business on policy and decision issues involving complex systems, social-technical change, civil society and sustainable development. Founding editor of World Streets: The Politics of Transport in Cities | See Britton online at https://goo.gl/9CJXTh and @ericbritton