The incompetent leading the unwilling to do the unnecessary.
Oops. This harsh charge has been leveled on an increasing number of occasions by people and groups across and beyond Penang who are highly dissatisfied with the competence, appropriateness and huge cost of the on-going “Penang Transport Master Plan” and related infrastructure projects and measures. Is there any validity to this charge, or is it just a case of political quibbling? Let’s take a step back and have a look.
How competent is the PTMP and the team behind it?
A 16 November 2018 Battle of Ideas Google Survey reports more than 21,000 background references expressing different points of view of the competence, the need for further skills upgrading at all levels of the planning process, and specific recommendations of the much-contested, long-pending and greatly behind-schedule Penang Transport Master Plan.
We invite you to have a good look at the results of this search at http://bit.ly/2zbJm9b and make up your own mind on the subject. You will find additional information on the subject in the Working Brief postings here at https://wp.me/p3GVVk-mb
LATEST NEWS: PRESS AND SOCIAL MEDIA:
* Click here — http://bit.ly/2zbQUJ2
Abundant valuable background and perspective on this topic of the importance for upgrading technical and institutional competence at all levels of the state and local government can be found in the eight volume report and recommendations of the highly respected international transport consultancy, Halcrow, — https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B41h-Am2TpUHdVVrZ0NiVGxNUlE?tid=0B41h-Am2TpUHT25JRXlzQ1dxZE0 —
Specifically on the issue of capacity building, the substantial chapter 8.3 on Institutional Strengthening from the final Halcrow report of 13 March 2013 under the title “The Recommended Transport Master Plan Strategy — is strongly recommended as an expert view from an independent and qualified source.
Finally to fully understand the cycle of main events that took place from the beginning of and defined the PTMP proposal, we would draw your attention to the following humorous (but accurate) three minute summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B9o1baUaP8
The individuals behind the Penang Master Plan are good, well educated and caring people. But they have the wrong skills in this case.
The present plan and process is seriously flawed. The importance of skills and competence upgrading at all levels of the planning, policy and implementation process cannot be exaggerated. And ever evidence points to the fact that this critical upgrading and education process is being ignored as the key actors continue to believe that the key to cutting road congestion and emissions lies in further infrastructure capacity expansion and not in TDM – Transport Demand Management — as the leading edge of expertise and performance have understood for more than a generation. Penang needs to catch up!
Your comments, criticism and eventual further references and conclusions are most welcome. You might wish to note them here, or address them by email direct to email@example.com. Or by direct video-conference to the Skype address: newmobility.
# # #
About the author:
9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France
Bio: Educated as a development economist, Francis Eric Knight-Britton is an American political scientist, teacher and sustainability activist who has worked on missions and advisory assignments on all continents. Professor of Sustainable Development, Economy and Democracy at the Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Paris), he is MD of EcoPlan Association, an independent non-profit advisory network providing strategic counsel for government and business on policy and decision issues involving complex systems, social-technical change, civil society and sustainable development. Founding editor of World Streets: The Politics of Transport in Cities | See Britton online at https://goo.gl/9CJXTh, @ericbritton. @worldstreets and firstname.lastname@example.org