The central premise of the State’s strategy is simple . . . to “move people, not vehicles”. – From the Penang Transport Master Plan, at https://goo.gl/h9q8wm
INVITATION TO AN OPEN PUBLIC BRAINSTORM:
Can we get your support for or your reactions to a draft proposal that follows, for comparing the merits and the usefulness for the people of Penang for five alternative strategies for dealing with Penang’s most pressing transport/mobility needs and priorities? (Note: This is a very rough first introduction to this idea for creating a comprehensive independent basis for comparing the alternative strategies, targets and competence.)
It is time well past for civil society to step forward with a New Mobility Agenda, strategy and guidelines to improve mobility and access for all in all of Penang. The present proposals and projects of the current state government administration and their “Transport Master Plan” are entirely inadequate in face of the many challenges, felt needs and priorities of the vast majority of Penangites.
As things stand today from the vantage of a qualified sustainable transport planner, it has to be said that there is no strategy, there is no plan; there are only a collection of unlinked mega proposals for crushingly expensive (for future taxpayers) infrastructure projects that will almost inevitably do more harm than good. And all that while offering little relief to the people of Penang in the years immediately ahead.
Can on-street parking fees really help places with poor public transport?
The short answer is yes!
The idea of slowing top speeds on traffic in the city to reduce accidents and achieve other important systemic benefits would seem like a pretty sensible, straightforward and affordable thing to do. For a lot of reasons. Let’s have a look.
* You may also want to check out our Slow City 2017 Reader and Slow City: Start here.
FOR THE RECORD AND IN BRIEF:
The first goal of a Slow City project for a city is (a) to reduce traffic accidents and their human and economic costs sharply, by (b) strategically slowing down traffic speeds, system-wise. This gives the city a measurable output (accident data and on-street and in-vehicle ITS feedback), indispensable for evaluation and management purposes.
In this way a Slow City project relates closely in many ways to the more widely known Smart Cities projects, integrating information and communication technology (ICT) and Internet of things (IoT) technology in a secure fashion to manage the city’s assets
What were the weaknesses of our collaborative summer 2016 push
- Very few – terrific job. Most sincerely! But also, to be honest and strategic . . .